Comments on: Why Microsoft spam our blog http://www.flex888.com/2006/10/24/why-microsoft-spam-our-blog.html never too late to make the web more usable and beautiful Sat, 19 Jul 2008 23:43:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 By: pens http://www.flex888.com/2006/10/24/why-microsoft-spam-our-blog.html#comment-20279 pens Sat, 29 Sep 2007 07:17:50 +0000 http://www.flex888.com/2006/10/24/why-microsoft-spam-our-blog.html#comment-20279 Hello nice blog! !! <a href="http://www.mykaraokecdg.com.au/skin1/buttons/CVS/o/index.php" rel="nofollow">pen</a> It's my new page.about pens. Hello nice blog! !!
pen
It’s my new page.about pens.

]]> By: Peter http://www.flex888.com/2006/10/24/why-microsoft-spam-our-blog.html#comment-1904 Peter Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:43:50 +0000 http://www.flex888.com/2006/10/24/why-microsoft-spam-our-blog.html#comment-1904 Yeah, spam that is manually done is pretty much impossible to discern 100% without starting to weed out legitimate comments. Also, be sure to change up your anti-spam words every once in a while. Yeah, spam that is manually done is pretty much impossible to discern 100% without starting to weed out legitimate comments.

Also, be sure to change up your anti-spam words every once in a while.

]]> By: Flexguy http://www.flex888.com/2006/10/24/why-microsoft-spam-our-blog.html#comment-1884 Flexguy Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:04:29 +0000 http://www.flex888.com/2006/10/24/why-microsoft-spam-our-blog.html#comment-1884 That makes it even more interesting. Why a New Delhi company spams for Microsoft. What they gain from this? That makes it even more interesting. Why a New Delhi company spams for Microsoft. What they gain from this?

]]> By: Tom Chiverton http://www.flex888.com/2006/10/24/why-microsoft-spam-our-blog.html#comment-1874 Tom Chiverton Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:39:50 +0000 http://www.flex888.com/2006/10/24/why-microsoft-spam-our-blog.html#comment-1874 I'm as much into MS bashing as the next geek, but that IP is owned by a company in New Delhi, not the US. I’m as much into MS bashing as the next geek, but that IP is owned by a company in New Delhi, not the US.

]]>